6月13日雅思寫作真題思路解析 附7分范文
來源：環球教育
小編：長安 4956月13日的雅思考試也結束啦！6月10日上海環球教育徐祎嬌老師公開課上有類似命中了本次考題！大家快快關注起來吧~
話不多說，我們來看一下這一次由上海環球教育余曰簡老師帶來的雅思寫作范文解析~
06-13 觀點類 - 環保話題
Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
題目大意：
個人無力改善環境。只有政府和大公司可以做到。同意或反對？
思路：
任務回應：
題目觀點由2部分組成，需全部回應：1）個人無力改善環境；2）環保只能靠政府和企業。
論證邏輯：
文章中遇到帶有武斷含義的詞要留意，Only是強調排他性的武斷表達，如果選擇同意，很難證明（即很難從邏輯推導出政府和企業和環保之間的唯一性，也很難用2個以上的成功案例來證明這是一個普遍的事實），所以這道題目建議選擇完全反對。即主體段-1：寫個人完全可以有所作為來改善環境；主體段-2：反駁“只有政府企業能改善環境”這個武斷的概念（即光靠他們這種理論說不通）。
提綱梳理如下：
范文
Some people assert that there is no justification for individuals in tackling environmental problems,whereas it is the business exclusive to authorities and companies. I completely disagree with this opinion as I do not see any fields that can be isolated from the general public.
From an individual perspective, there are many things they can do to reduce their contribute to environmental pollution. One option is that residents can reduce the emissions of the carbon dioxide by driving less and traveling more by public transport.The effect has been approved in many metropolitan cities like Shanghai, where convenient and affordable public transport services have played an importantrole in the reduction of exhaust fumes from vehicles. Another practical action that can be taken by individuals is to classify rubbish, which can make a huge difference in recycling waste.
In addition, it looks absurd to me that environmental issues are reckoned to be only addressed by politicians and business moguls. While some might argue that it is the administration that has the power to legislate against pollution, we should not forget that many bills are initiated under the influence of the public opinion. One convincing example is the decision of Brexit based on the referendum of British citizens. Also,industrial pollution should not be the only culprit to blame. One striking fact we cannot afford to ignore is the enormous amount of daily rubbish from households, such as the plastic bags and packages. How can we focus only on enterprises while turning a blind eye on household waste?
In conclusion, I do not think the problem of pollution could be addressed by authorities and large companies without the involvement of individuals.
相關詞匯：
Exclusive 僅限于
Authority 政府
Isolate 隔絕
carbon dioxide 二氧化碳
metropolitan 大都市
affordable 負擔得起的
exhaust fumes 排放
moguls 巨頭
the administration 政府
legislate 立法
initiate 發起
referendum 公投
culprit 罪魁禍首
相關句型：
It looks absurd to methat …
While some might arguethat …, we should not forget …
It is the administration that has the power to …
One convincing exampleis …
One striking fact wecannot afford to ignore is …
How can we focus onlyon… while turning a blind eye on … ?
